"Dying to Get In", Healthcare Reform and Digital Storytelling


Besides making a point about the state of healthcare in the US today, my friends and I created the video above as a form of “digital storytelling”, using new tools to share an age-old content delivery system. Do you think facts and figures have worked better?

I’ve been hearing a lot more about storytelling these days. For example, in a recent NPR segment about storytelling at the Edinburgh festival, an audience member said in her Scottish burr, “We’ve been so clever about computers and pushed entertainment as far as we can, we’re going back to the original art form”.

This might help explain the increased buzz around great user-generated events like the Moth StorySlam and Mortified and radio shows like This American Life and now the Moth Radio Hour. There is something old-fashioned, comforting and even primal about storytelling.

While this supposedly new-found interest in storytelling coincides with increased interest in digital social media, I don't see it necessarily as a denunciation of technology.

In fact, as social media tools get even more user-friendly and widely adopted, there are new ways to share stories. If anything, this means we need to focus even more on creating compelling content. Tim Wu of the Zero Divide Foundation asserts that focusing on tools without content is like a reverse of that "Field of Dreams" adage: "If you build JUST that, they WON'T come." For example, in making our video, I used affordable consumer electronics to make the point that the video was not about having the best equipment but having the right kind of storytelling.

There's no denying that what draws people in is storytelling and metaphor. As researchers like George Lakoff and Drew Westen have shown, our brains are hard-wired for metaphors and their emotional content. Both researchers have written extensively on how progressives need to learn to use metaphor more effectively in our advocacy and campaigns rather than relying on "facts and figures" as Lakoff puts it. Westen points out in his book The Political Brain: the Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation that "Political persuasion is about networks and narratives." As part of my work, I've started facilitating workshops to help nonprofits and community groups use their networks get to the heart of their narratives and explore new metaphors to express this.

But using the right kind of narrative is what we're all still figuring out. I've been wondering more and more if testimonials are the 21st century's "facts and figures". Opponents often dismiss cases of individuals facing injustice as one-offs or unfortunate exceptions to the rule that don't prove systemic problems. This thinking shaped our video "Dying to Get In" and why we chose a metaphorical "USA Healthcare System" to express the impossible situation faced by many Americans. While our video has a story's requisite beginning, middle and end, it doesn't necessarily have a central protagonist. I hoped that this would illustrate a trend rather than an individual situation. In this way, "digital storytelling" permitted us to explore new modes of narrative to connect with and persuade the public.

What impact will the video have? Hard to say. Even though the jury is still out on healthcare reform, I hope the video spurs further conversation and more storytelling. With that in mind, you can benefit from the wonders of social media by leaving your comments here or on YouTube. Let's keep this conversation going...

http://culturekitchen.com/will_coley/blog/dying_to_get_in_healthcare_reform_and_digital_storytelling
Mouse over the text to select it, then press Ctrl-C to copy it.
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)
Will Coley's picture



Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may link to webpages through the weblinks registry
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Flash node macros can be added to this post.
  • Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Easily link to terms in various wikis. For help, see <a href="/interwiki/1">interwiki</a>.
  • Links to specified hosts will have a rel="nofollow" added to them.

  • You may post PHP code. You should include <?php ?> tags.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • E-Mail addresses are hidden with reCAPTCHA Mailhide.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

User login

The Publisher
Liza Sabater

Daily servings of political dissent
culturekitchen

Grassroots News and
Activism for New Yorkers

Daily Gotham

Feminist Bloggers
Network

BlogSheroes

A new kind of vouyerism
Voogling

Art + Code + Philosophy
Potatoland.blog

Got any dirt, tips, leads or money for us? Then drop us a line or two at editors [at] culturekitchen [dot] com or use our general contact form to reach everybody in the editorial team ASAP.

Nibble daily on our brainy goodness with our daily syndication digest. You'll receive an email with a list and links to the previous day's posts.



Powered by FeedBlitz

Upcoming events

  • No upcoming events available

QUOTES

I have this to say about the radicals: I love you. But you don’t have to look to hard to find examples, among us, of some of the same things being rightly criticized in the Brittney Gilbert blogswarm referenced above. An example:

It’s a fine thing to slam someone for writing something you find offensive. It’s another thing to slam someone for not writing something the way you would have, or for writing about a subject other than the one you think they ought to have picked.

It’s a fine thing to criticize someone moderating comments on their blog in a way you don’t agree with, but it’s another to slam someone for not moderating comments on their blog 24/7.

It’s a fine thing to decide that your blog has a specific mission. It’s another to decide that your blog’s mission is the only mission any blog should have.

In short, it’s one thing for you to be disappointed in or angered by bloggers with whom you share some political viewpoints.

It’s another to assume they owe you anything other than basic human respect because you’ve done them the favor of reading their work.

— Chris Clarke

Poll